Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894059›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Advancing plant DNA barcoding: integrating chloroplast genome sequencing, cryptic diversity discovery and machine learning.

Pratham Shah, Nayanshi Jain, Nilesh Gawande, Trivima Sharma, Krishnamoorthy Devanathan, Subramanian Sankaranarayanan, Raju Balaji

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pratham ShahDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Bhopal, 462066, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Nayanshi JainDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Engineering School Road, Berhampur, 7600010, Odisha, India.
Nilesh GawandeDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Sciences, Woxsen University Hyderabad, Telangana, Hyderabad, 502345, India.
Trivima SharmaFaculty of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, Kantaben Kashiram Institute of Agriculture Sciences and Research, Ganpat University, Ganpat Vidyangar Mehsana-Gozaria Highway, Khreva, 384012, Gujarat, India.
Krishnamoorthy DevanathanDepartment of Botany, The American College, Madurai, 625002, Tamil Nadu, India.
Subramanian SankaranarayananDepartment of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, 382355, Gujarat, India. s.sankar@iitgn.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-2113
Raju BalajiMolecular Biology and Genomics Lab, Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Thandalam, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India. balajir24.smc@saveetha.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-1510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate plant species identification underpins taxonomy, conservation, ecological monitoring, and the authentication of medicinal and food resources. While classical morphology-based approaches often struggle with cryptic or closely related taxa, DNA barcoding has emerged as a standardized molecular framework for species identification. In plants, core plastid markers such as rbcL and matK, together with nuclear regions like ITS and ITS2, have been widely adopted, yet species-level resolution remains limited in recently diverged or hybridizing lineages. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled chloroplast genome sequencing and plastome-scale "super-barcoding," substantially improving discriminatory power and facilitating the derivation of lineage-specific and mini-barcodes. Concurrently, multi-locus barcoding, metabarcoding, and environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches are revealing cryptic diversity and reshaping our understanding of plant community structure and species interactions. Emerging machine-learning methods further enhance barcode-based classification, reference-library curation, and integrative species delimitation. This review synthesizes developments in plastome-guided barcoding, cryptic diversity discovery, and data-driven analytics, outlining methodological advances, practical constraints, and future directions. We emphasize that continued expansion and rigorous curation of reference libraries, combined with transparent benchmarking of computational models, are essential for reliable, scalable, and genome-aware plant identification systems in the genomic era.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGenome, ChloroplastPlantsDNA, PlantGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMachine LearningPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantChloroplast genomeCryptic diversityDNA barcodingMachine learningMetabarcoding and eDNAPlant taxonomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.