ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Re-evaluating hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: clinical impact of updated multigene panel sequencing and genetic counseling.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is observed among women with a family history of ovarian cancer, with or without breast cancer, as well as among carriers of pathogenic germline variants in ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes. Over the past two decades, additional OC–associated genes beyond BRCA1/2 have been identified, highlighting the need for updated genetic evaluation in women previously classified as high-risk without a known PV to ensure correct diagnosis and prevent overtreatment. This retrospective, quality assurance cohort study aimed to evaluate whether updated multigene panel sequencing and genetic counseling improve risk stratification. All women enrolled in the OC surveillance program at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev between 2018 and 2023 and received counseling prior to the implementation of the revised 2017 guidelines in Denmark, were included. Among 674 women (median age 40.9), 174 had a BRCA1 PV, 168 had a BRCA2 PV, 55 had PVs in moderate-risk genes, and 277 were enrolled based on family history of OC ± BC alone. Of these 277, 216 (78%) underwent updated genetic testing and counselling; 165 (76%) had no increased risk of OC and were released from gynecological surveillance. Over a mean follow-up of 48 months, none developed OC, and one developed BC, corresponding to a negative predictive value of 99% for the updated risk assessment. Updated genetic testing and counseling significantly improve risk stratification in women previously classified as increased risk of OC based solely on family history. This supports re-evaluation of at-risk women and families to guide appropriate surveillance, reduce unnecessary follow-up and interventions, and align clinical practice with evolving guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.