Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894033›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2026

Re-evaluating hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: clinical impact of updated multigene panel sequencing and genetic counseling.

Julie Isabelle Plougmann Gislinge, Anna Byrjalsen, Klara Vinsand Naver, Helle Vibeke Clausen, Pernille Ravn, Kresten Rubeck Petersen, Karin A W Wadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie Isabelle Plougmann GislingeDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Fertility, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Anna ByrjalsenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klara Vinsand NaverDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Fertility, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Helle Vibeke ClausenDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Fertility, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Pernille RavnDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Fertility, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Kresten Rubeck PetersenDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Fertility, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Karin A W WadtDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. Karin.wadt@regionh.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is observed among women with a family history of ovarian cancer, with or without breast cancer, as well as among carriers of pathogenic germline variants in ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes. Over the past two decades, additional OC–associated genes beyond BRCA1/2 have been identified, highlighting the need for updated genetic evaluation in women previously classified as high-risk without a known PV to ensure correct diagnosis and prevent overtreatment. This retrospective, quality assurance cohort study aimed to evaluate whether updated multigene panel sequencing and genetic counseling improve risk stratification. All women enrolled in the OC surveillance program at Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev between 2018 and 2023 and received counseling prior to the implementation of the revised 2017 guidelines in Denmark, were included. Among 674 women (median age 40.9), 174 had a BRCA1 PV, 168 had a BRCA2 PV, 55 had PVs in moderate-risk genes, and 277 were enrolled based on family history of OC ± BC alone. Of these 277, 216 (78%) underwent updated genetic testing and counselling; 165 (76%) had no increased risk of OC and were released from gynecological surveillance. Over a mean follow-up of 48 months, none developed OC, and one developed BC, corresponding to a negative predictive value of 99% for the updated risk assessment. Updated genetic testing and counseling significantly improve risk stratification in women previously classified as increased risk of OC based solely on family history. This supports re-evaluation of at-risk women and families to guide appropriate surveillance, reduce unnecessary follow-up and interventions, and align clinical practice with evolving guidelines.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDenmarkFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBreast cancerHereditaryNext-generation sequencingOvarian cancerPathogenic variantSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41894033
PMCPMC13031182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.