Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41894032›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026

[Failure of critical infrastructures in German hospitals : Online survey on crisis management structures and exercises in hospitals].

Manuel Geiger, Steffen Neuner, Muhammed Enes Bodur, Alexander Fekete

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuel GeigerInstitut für Rettungsingenieurwesen und Gefahrenabwehr, TH Köln, 50679, Köln, Deutschland.ORCID 0009-0008-3506-4502
Steffen NeunerInstitut für Rettungsingenieurwesen und Gefahrenabwehr, TH Köln, 50679, Köln, Deutschland. steffen.neuner@th-koeln.de.ORCID 0009-0006-1545-4277
Muhammed Enes BodurInstitut für Rettungsingenieurwesen und Gefahrenabwehr, TH Köln, 50679, Köln, Deutschland.ORCID 0009-0001-2984-5766
Alexander FeketeInstitut für Rettungsingenieurwesen und Gefahrenabwehr, TH Köln, 50679, Köln, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-8029-6774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitals are critical infrastructures and essential for healthcare provision, yet they heavily depend on the continuous availability of other parts of the critical infrastructure, such as electricity and water supply. In emergencies, organizational aspects often play a crucial role as hospitals need to shift from routine organizational structures to specialized crisis management frameworks. This survey investigates the organizational structures used by German hospitals in crisis management, focusing on the frequency and types of exercises related to critical infrastructure failures, particularly water and power supply as well as sewage disposal.

objectiveWhile organizational preparations for mass casualty incidents are common in German hospitals, insufficient structures are implemented for critical infrastructure failures as well as how often these scenarios are practiced. This study aims to address these gaps by examining hospital crisis management structures, the frequency of related exercises and the interplay among hospital size, ownership and regional factors. The research is part of the NOWATER project, funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, 13N15281), which investigates these aspects.

methodsThe survey conducted from November 2022 to April 2023 and targeting hospitals across Germany, gathered 72 fully completed responses, representing 3.8% of Germany's total hospitals.

resultsThe findings reveal a diverse range of crisis management structures employed across hospitals, with 47% adhering to the federal recommendation for the Feuerwehr-Dienstvorschrift 100 (Fire Department service regulations 100) framework; however, many hospitals, especially those with fewer than 200 beds, opt for regular organizational structures or hybrid models. The survey also highlights a significant variation in the frequency of exercises across hospitals. While annual exercises for power failure scenarios are common, training related to water and wastewater disruptions is rarely conducted. Additionally, hospitals with fewer than 200 beds tend to conduct fewer exercises than larger hospitals, with significant disparities in resources influencing exercise frequency and type.

conclusionThe results suggest that while larger hospitals are more likely to follow recommended crisis management structures and conduct regular exercises, smaller hospitals often lack the personnel and financial resources necessary for such preparations. This disparity underlines the need for tailored crisis management strategies that account for hospital size and available resources. In conclusion, the study underlines the importance of regular crisis management exercises to improve resilience and preparedness for infrastructure failures. It also calls for increased focus on water and wastewater contingency planning, which currently lags behind emergency power supply preparations in most hospitals. Policymakers and healthcare managers are encouraged to support hospitals, particularly smaller ones, with the necessary resources to implement effective crisis management structures and exercises.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningHospital AdministrationHospitalsGermanyHumansMass Casualty IncidentsPublic Health InfrastructureSurveys and QuestionnairesCrisis managementEmergency planningHospital incident action planningHospital incident management teamSupply

Identifiers

PMID41894032
PMCPMC13226423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.