ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Clinical and surgical implications of emissary venous anatomy.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo review the anatomy and clinical significance of the cranial emissary veins (CEVs) with an emphasis on the posterior fossa pathways, their relevance to neuroradiologic interpretation, and implications for surgical planning.
methodsA narrative, imaging-focused review was performed while discussing anatomic descriptions and clinically relevant patterns of CEV appearance on cross-sectional imaging.
resultsCEVs are valveless veins that pass through cranial apertures and connect the intracranial venous sinuses and extracranial veins. CEVs play a crucial role in normal cerebral venous drainage, brain thermoregulation, and various pathological states, particularly in high-flow vascular malformations, fistulas, and venous thrombosis. CEVs must be identified and reported before surgeries involving the posterior fossa and mastoid region to avoid complications. CEVs, specifically of the posterior fossa, are a source of complications that may include uncontrollable bleeding and air embolism, venous thrombosis, and venous ischemic and hemorrhagic infarcts. CEVs may also be therapeutically beneficial, as a large mastoid emissary vein (MEV) may provide endovascular access for treating lesions involving the transverse or sigmoid sinus.
conclusionKnowledge of the key CEV anatomy is important for the neuroradiologist to inform preoperative planning and promptly identify their pathologic variations. Beyond neurosurgical procedures, understanding the anatomy of the emissary veins is crucial for reconstructive surgeons operating in the scalp and craniofacial region. Misidentification of this anatomy and injury to these structures can lead to intra-operative and post-operative complications, including bleeding, flap congestion, and even intracranial complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41893998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.