ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Mental health assessment as part of European pediatric primary care: potential instruments and implementation considerations.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Europe, mental health problems among children represent an increasing public health concern. Longstanding, trust-based relationships between pediatricians and families place pediatric primary care in a key position for early identification. Given the limited consultation time, feasible and structured procedures for early identification are needed. This narrative review identifies standardized mental health assessment instruments for pediatric primary care and discusses considerations for their implementation. A structured search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted in August 2024. Peer-reviewed studies published since 2013 that examined standardized mental health assessments in pediatric primary care were included. Instruments were evaluated with regard to psychometric quality and clinical usefulness. Five instruments were identified: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), its short form PSC-17, the Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). All showed adequate psychometric properties. The SDQ, PSC/PSC-17, and ASQ:SE were considered feasible for routine care. The CBCL, despite strong psychometric properties, appeared less suitable due to its length and scoring complexity.
conclusionStandardized mental health assessment instruments may support early identification of mental health problems in primary care and facilitate timely referral to treatment. Nonetheless, they should complement rather than replace comprehensive clinical assessment. Successful implementation requires appropriate training, structured referral pathways, and sufficient access to follow-up mental health services. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Pediatricians play a central role in early identification of mental health problems among children. There is currently no consensus on which standardized assessments are suitable for pediatric primary care. WHAT IS NEW: • This narrative review identifies assessments relevant to pediatric primary care and highlights ethical and structural considerations, with particular emphasis on the responsibility to ensure appropriate follow-up care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41893911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.