Trial reportJAMA network open2026
Long-Term Outcomes of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 in Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02813967 (S-1 Concurrent With Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy for Elderly Chinese Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
S-1 Concurrent With Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy for Elderly Chinese Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center Phase-III Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age and CIRS-G for risk stratification in elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
57 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Most older patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are unable to complete standard platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) due to reduced organ reserve, comorbidities, and malnutrition. A new treatment option-CCRT with S-1-has been found to have high efficacy and fewer toxic effects for this population, yet long-term data supporting its use remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of CCRT with S-1 vs radiotherapy (RT) alone in older patients with EC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted at 23 centers in China was not prespecified in the trial protocol. Patients aged 70 to 85 years with histologically confirmed EC were enrolled between June 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018. Data cutoff date was February 1, 2025, with an additional follow-up of 54 months beyond the primary analysis. Data were analyzed from February 1 to April 1, 2025. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive CCRT with S-1 consisting of 54 Gy in 30 fractions with S-1, 70 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 14 and 29 to 42, or RT alone consisting of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 2.0 Gy per day 5 days per week. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific mortality, cumulative incidence of death from EC or other reasons, and cumulative incidences of locoregional or distant metastasis during treatment or relapse after treatment. Results: A total of 298 patients (median [IQR] age, 77 [74-79] years; 180 males [60.4%]) were enrolled. There were 151 patients (50.7%) clinically diagnosed with stage III to IV disease. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 87 (85-92) months, the median OS was 24.7 (95% CI, 21.2-37.6) months in the CCRT group and 15.1 (95% CI, 12.4-18.6) months in the RT group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90; P = .005). The 5-year OS rates were 33.5% (95% CI, 26.7%-42.1%) and 24.4% (95% CI, 18.3%-32.4%) for the CCRT and RT groups, respectively; the 8-year OS rates were 26.2% and 16.1%, respectively. The median PFS was 18.7 (95% CI, 13.1-25.8) months in the CCRT group and 9.2 (95% CI, 7.9-12.7) months in the RT group (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90; P = .005). Cause-specific analyses showed reduced EC-related mortality with CCRT (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.89; P = .005), with 8-year absolute risks of 58.5% vs 72.9%, respectively, and no excess noncancer-related mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, long-term results showed that CCRT with S-1 was associated with a sustained survival benefit compared with RT alone, without increased noncancer-related mortality. This finding supports CCRT with S-1 as the preferred regimen for patients aged 70 to 85 years with EC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02813967.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.