Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41893842›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers in a Neonatal High-Risk Population.

Benjamin Lassebro, Matilda Morin, Weiyao Yin, Sven Sandin, Ulrika Ådén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin LassebroDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Matilda MorinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Weiyao YinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven SandinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrika ÅdénDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental condition with both genetic and environmental origins. Early detection is crucial for successful clinical intervention, improving future health, and adaptive functioning. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) in a neonatal high-risk population using subsequent clinical ASD diagnoses as the reference standard and to identify factors associated with the checklist's accuracy within this group. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, population-based cohort study identified children born in Sweden between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019, from the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Children were included if they were screened for autism using the checklist at corrected age 16 to 30 months. Follow-up for ASD in the National Patient Register extended from the day after inclusion or chronologic age 2 years, whichever occurred last, until December 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between June 6, 2024, and June 16, 2025. Exposure: Autism screening with the M-CHAT at 24-month neonatal follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the first recorded ASD diagnosis within the Swedish health care system among children categorized into the following neonatal high-risk groups: extremely preterm, small for gestational age, morphologic brain damage, neonatal encephalopathy, or other severe morbidity at birth. Diagnostic accuracy of the checklist was estimated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results: Among the 2178 children included in the study (median [IQR] corrected age at assessment, 26 [23-30] months; 1210 boys [55.6%]), 263 (12.1%) had positive screens. The overall sensitivity of the checklist was 62.4% (95% CI, 54.3%-69.7%); specificity, 91.2% (95% CI, 90.1%-92.4%), positive predictive value 31.4% (95% CI, 26.0%-37.1%), and negative predictive value 97.4% (95% CI, 96.7%-98.0%). Within the neonatal high-risk groups, children born extremely preterm had the highest proportion of positive screens and ASD diagnoses. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that in high-risk neonates, the M-CHAT had high specificity but moderate sensitivity when evaluated against later ASD diagnoses, highlighting the need for additional tools to improve detection.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChecklistChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySweden

Identifiers

PMID41893842
PMCPMC13032150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.