ArticleVaccines2026
Prophylactic HPV Vaccination in Gynaecological Practice: Recommendations, Practices, and Challenges Reported in the ESGO-PERCH HPV Survey.
Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHPV vaccination is highly effective in preventing HPV-related cancers when administered before viral exposure. However, vaccination practices for patients already diagnosed with gynaecological cancers remain poorly characterized. Understanding clinicians' perspectives and barriers is essential for optimizing preventive strategies in oncologic care.
methodsWe conducted an international, web-based survey among members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) and the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO). The questionnaire explored clinicians' attitudes, practices, and perceived obstacles regarding HPV vaccination in patients with gynaecological cancer or pre-invasive disease across multiple clinical scenarios and age groups.
resultsA total of 149 respondents from 33 countries completed the survey. Most clinicians supported HPV vaccination for patients treated for cervical precancer (78-82% for patients under 45 years), and even for invasive cervical cancer (57-62%). Recommendations varied by patients' age, cancer type, and treatment status. For endometrial and ovarian cancer, endorsement ranged from 16% to 53%, depending on patient age. Timing of vaccination was a point of divergence: some clinicians favoured vaccination immediately after treatment for CIN2+, while others recommended delaying vaccination depending on HPV test results. Reported barriers discouraging HPV vaccination recommendations included misinformation (69.8%), lack of patient education materials (52.3%), and time constraints (48.3%), alongside economic factors and uncertainty about efficacy in oncologic settings.
conclusionsThe survey shows that HPV vaccination is often recommended beyond evidence-supported indications. Randomized trials have not demonstrated a reduction in CIN2+ recurrence with adjuvant vaccination, and no evidence supports vaccination in women with invasive gynaecological cancers. These findings reveal a gap between clinical practice and available evidence, highlighting the need for clearer, evidence-based guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.