Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41893740›Full record

ReviewVaccines2026

The Road to Readiness: Commentary on the Journey of a Zoonotic H5 Influenza Vaccine Strain Update.

Alexander T Kennedy, Ray Longstaff, James Fitzpatrick, Clare Hughes, Maria Teresa Malatesta, Raffaella Brandi, Joanne Beighton, Eve Versage, Nedzad Music, Howard Xu and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05874713 (A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Observer-Blind Study, to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Homologous or Heterologous Priming and Booster Vaccinations With H5N8 or H5N6 MF59-adjuvanted, Cell Culture-derived Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects ≥18 Years of Age), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05874713 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Observer-Blind Study, to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Homologous or Heterologous Priming and Booster Vaccinations With H5N8 or H5N6 MF59-adjuvanted, Cell Culture-derived Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects ≥18 Years of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeqirusRan2023 to 2024Enrolled480ConditionsInfluenza, Human, Infections, Respiratory Tract Infections, Virus DiseasesArmsaH5N8c on Day 1, aH5N6c on Day 1, aH5N8c on Day 22, aH5N6c on Day 22, aH5N8c on Day 202
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexander T KennedySeqirus UK Ltd., Maidenhead SL6 8AD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-2569
Ray LongstaffSeqirus UK Ltd., Maidenhead SL6 8AD, UK.
James FitzpatrickSeqirus UK Ltd., Maidenhead SL6 8AD, UK.
Clare HughesSeqirus UK Ltd., Gaskill Road, Speke, Liverpool L24 9GR, UK.
Maria Teresa MalatestaSeqirus S.r.l., 53035 Siena, Italy.
Raffaella BrandiSeqirus S.r.l., 53035 Siena, Italy.
Joanne BeightonSeqirus UK Ltd., Gaskill Road, Speke, Liverpool L24 9GR, UK.
Eve VersageSeqirus USA Inc., Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Nedzad MusicSeqirus USA Inc., Waltham, MA 02451, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-6991-5511
Howard XuCSL Behring L.L.C., King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.
Monica PagniSeqirus S.r.l., 53035 Siena, Italy.
Matthew HohenbokenSeqirus USA Inc., Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Beverly TaylorSeqirus UK Ltd., Gaskill Road, Speke, Liverpool L24 9GR, UK.

Funding

CSL Seqirus N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary provides an overview of the development of a zoonotic influenza vaccine, in response to the emergence of an H5N1 subtype virus from clade 2.3.4.4b in mid-2020. When development was initiated, the World Health Organization (WHO) had recommended four candidate vaccine viruses; the A/Astrakhan/3212/2020-like strain was selected as it provided good coverage of circulating viruses and, critically, was available. To facilitate regulatory approval, the licence of an existing zoonotic vaccine, Aflunov (A/turkey/Turkey/01/2005)-a pre-pandemic monovalent A/H5N1 adjuvanted with MF59 and manufactured using the egg-based platform-was duplicated, with the plan to submit a variation to the duplicate licence for the strain update. This was supported by a ferret immunogenicity study using pseudoviruses (allowing the work to be conducted at a lower biosafety level), in conjunction with clinical data from the original Aflunov licence application, and a US study (NCT05874713) on another candidate zoonotic vaccine manufactured using the cell-based platform. Qualification batches for characterisation studies were manufactured at-risk, until calibrated, homologous reagents were available, and the final product release and stability studies were conducted, with rolling provision of stability data to health authorities. The vaccine was initially approved with a shorter shelf-life, allowing early distribution in certain countries, with later extension of the shelf-life once data became available. In terms of procurement and logistics, early consultation between the European Commission and EU member states resulted in the award of a Framework Contract for the initial supply of 665,000 doses to 15 states. Learnings from the development of this vaccine may help to improve pandemic readiness in the future.

Indexed as

clade 2.3.3.4bdevelopmentinfluenzapandemicpandemic preparednessregulatory approvalzoonotic vaccine

Identifiers

PMID41893740
PMCPMC13030769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.