ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Primarily Gasless Robot-Assisted Cholecystectomy in Dogs: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gallbladder disease is a common cause of morbidity in dogs, and cholecystectomy remains the definitive treatment in many cases. Although minimally invasive approaches offer recognized advantages, their adoption is limited by technical complexity and by the physiological effects of carbon dioxide (CO₂) pneumoperitoneum. This cadaveric study evaluated the feasibility of performing primarily gasless robot-assisted cholecystectomy under abdominal wall suspension in five canine cadavers. A normobaric operative field was established using a suspension device combined with the VersiusTM robotic platform. "Primarily gasless" was operationally defined as abdominal wall suspension without continuous pneumoperitoneum, allowing short-duration low-pressure CO₂ insufflation (≤8 mmHg) exclusively as a rescue maneuver when exposure was insufficient. Surgical feasibility was assessed through structured case-level reporting, including docking time, operative time, exposure quality of the hepatocystic triangle (predefined ordinal scale), clipping feasibility, intraoperative events, instrument exchanges, and need for rescue CO₂ insufflation. All procedures were completed in the cadaveric specimens. In three cadavers, the procedure was performed entirely without CO₂. In two cadavers, a single short-duration low-pressure CO₂ insufflation (6-8 mmHg for 3-5 minutes) was applied as a rescue maneuver. Adequate or optimal visualization of the hepatocystic triangle was achieved in all cases, and no intraoperative injuries occurred. These findings support the technical feasibility of a primarily gasless robotic approach in a canine cadaveric model. Controlled in vivo studies are required to evaluate the physiological impact, perioperative outcomes, and translational applicability before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.