ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Laboratory Surveillance of Bovine Brucellosis: Predictors of Rose Bengal Test Positivity in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa (2021-2024).
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine brucellosis is an endemic zoonotic disease in South Africa with significant consequences for livestock productivity and public health. Although routine laboratory surveillance data from the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) are widely collected, they are seldom used to investigate temporal and spatial patterns of disease detection. This study aimed to examine temporal, seasonal, and spatial predictors of RBT positivity for bovine brucellosis in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. A retrospective observational study was conducted using routine laboratory records from the Mpumalanga Provincial Veterinary Laboratory between January 2021 and December 2024. The dataset included all bovine serum samples with complete information on testing date, municipality, and RBT results. Laboratory submissions were recorded as batches, defined as groups of serum samples submitted together to the laboratory as part of a single surveillance or investigation event. The primary outcome was batch-level RBT positivity, defined as the presence of at least one RBT-positive serum sample within a submission batch. Temporal (year of testing), seasonal (season of submission), and spatial (local municipality area) variables were evaluated as predictors of RBT positivity using logistic regression models. Mixed-effects logistic regression accounted for the clustering of submissions within municipalities. A total of 568 submission batches comprising 67,974 serum samples were analysed, of which 6182 tested positive, yielding an overall positivity of 9.1%. RBT positivity increased significantly in 2023 compared with 2021 (AOR = 2.47; 95% CI: 2.27-2.68). Seasonal variation was observed, with higher odds of positivity in spring (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.65-1.97) and lower odds in autumn and winter relative to summer. Mixed-effects modelling indicated significant residual spatial heterogeneity in RBT positivity across municipalities. Routine laboratory surveillance data can provide valuable epidemiological insights into the temporal, seasonal, and spatial dynamics of bovine brucellosis detection and support risk-based surveillance strategies in endemic livestock systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.