ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
A Teaching Reform Practice to Improve Research Literacy of Veterinary Postgraduate Students Based on Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the importance of researcher literacy in veterinary postgraduate education, conventional training often overlooks the methodologies of evidence synthesis. This study assessed an evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM) pathway that integrates structured meta-analysis practice into the curriculum. Veterinary postgraduates were assigned to either an EBVM-intensive training group or a comparison group receiving routine instruction. Pre- and post-intervention assessments using a structured questionnaire revealed that the training group achieved superior proficiency in literature retrieval, critical appraisal, and methodological rigor. Notably, this pedagogical approach yielded nine peer-reviewed meta-analyses between 2021 and 2025, while no comparable output was observed in the comparison group. This evidence suggests that integrating hands-on meta-analysis into EBVM instruction serves as a catalyst, transforming theoretical learning into tangible, high-quality scholarly output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.