Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41893682›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Understanding Error Culture in Veterinary Medicine: A Survey Among Veterinary Support Staff Across German-Speaking Countries.

Corinna M Montag, Christin Kleinsorgen, Holger A Volk, Claudia Busse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corinna M MontagDepartment of Small Animals Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Christin KleinsorgenCentre for Teaching, E-Learning-Services, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-1691
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animals Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7312-638X
Claudia BusseDepartment of Small Animals Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 491094227Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture 11-76251-680/2024 ZN 4333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Errors are an unavoidable part of veterinary practice; however, little is known about how veterinary support staff perceive and deal with errors in their veterinary teams. This study examined perception of errors, contributing factors, and approaches to error management among veterinary support staff in German-speaking countries. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted, including 205 fully completed questionnaires. Reported errors were most often linked to tasks such as billing, team interaction, and handling and restraining animals. The most frequently reported contributing factors were time pressure, high workload, and communication problems. Most respondents reported that errors are openly spoken up about in everyday work (68%) and discussed within the team (76%). At the same time, perceptions of feeling safe to report an error varied: while 69% reported always or mostly feeling safe to speak up, 31% felt safe only sometimes, rarely or never. In addition, 16% of participants reported having deliberately not disclosed an error. According to 81% of respondents, no structured error reporting or management system was in place in their workplace. Overall, the findings show that error handling among veterinary support staff remains largely informal and individual, highlighting an important area for further research, improved reporting structures and training.

Indexed as

error cultureerror managementerror preventionerror reportingveterinary support staff

Identifiers

PMID41893682
PMCPMC13029886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.