ArticleToxins2026
Pharmacological Treatments and Adverse Reactions Following Snake Antivenom Therapy: A Collaborative Study by Healthcare Professionals in the Southernmost Region of Thailand.
Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The administration of specific immunoglobulin G-based antivenoms is a key strategy for treating snakebite envenoming victims. However, serious adverse reactions, such as anaphylaxis or serum sickness, are frequently observed following such administration. In addition, inflammation associated with delayed wound healing considerably drives the irrational use of antibiotics or anti-inflammatory agents, which may be linked to adverse reactions following antivenom treatment. In this study, we evaluated the factors contributing to adverse effects following the administration of snake antivenom, especially pharmacological treatment and premedication intended to prevent adverse reactions. Our retrospective study was conducted by healthcare professionals in Narathiwat, the southernmost province in Thailand, and it involved 980 patients confirmed to have been snakebitten from 2016 to 2021. Of these cases, 513 were treated with antivenom. Prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the correlation between adverse reactions and medications. Following antivenom administration, the majority of the patients exhibited no adverse reactions (86.7%). Nevertheless, skin rash, itching, wheezing, angioedema, chest tightness, and fever were observed in 13.3% of those receiving snake antivenom. After the administration of antivenom for Malayan pit viper bite, adverse reactions occurred in 11.7% of the sample, especially among referral patients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.