ArticleToxics2026
Structural Insights into the Interaction of Bisphenol F (BPF) and Bisphenol S (BPS) with Estrogen Receptors for Endocrine Safety Assessment.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) perturb hormonal homeostasis, dysregulating multiple biological pathways and subsequently resulting in adverse health outcomes, including impaired reproductive function. Bisphenols represent an important subclass of EDCs with widespread use in polycarbonate plastics, thermal paper formulations, epoxy resins, and various everyday consumer products. Bisphenol A (BPA) was the first bisphenol to be synthesized, with extensive industrial applications. However, the concerns over its potential health risks, most notably reproductive dysfunction, prompted the development and introduction of several structurally related BPA analogues. That said, studies on the potential hormonal effects of these BPA analogues remain limited. Therefore, strengthening the evidence base on their reproductive safety evaluation remains an essential priority for ensuring their safe application, and this study contributes to that broader objective. The study aimed to explore the potential endocrine-disrupting activity of two commonly used BPA analogues, bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS), on reproductive hormone signalling, contributing to ongoing safety assessment efforts. The molecular interactions of these analogues with the estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and estrogen receptor-β (ERβ) were analyzed through structural binding characterization employing the induced fit docking (IFD) approach using the Schrödinger 2019 suite. The overall results revealed that the two indicated BPA analogues were placed successfully in the ligand-binding pockets of ERα and ERβ. Their binding pattern and molecular interactions showed certain similarities; however, they did not fully replicate the amino acid residue environment of the native ligands of ERα and ERβ, estradiol. Notably, the binding energy estimations revealed that BPF and BPS showed substantially lower values than those calculated for native ligands of ERα and ERβ. In summary, this study suggests that BPF and BPS exhibit lower predicted binding affinity toward ERα and ERβ under the applied molecular docking conditions. However, these computational findings do not establish receptor activation, endocrine potency, or safety outcomes, and the potential involvement of other reproductive signalling pathways warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.