ArticleToxics2026
Evaluation of Three Treatments for the Resource Utilization of Cephalosporin C Fermentation Residue.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In China, antibiotic fermentation residue has been listed as a "hazardous waste" due to its high residual concentrations of antibiotics. There are many ways to deal with antibiotic fermentation residue; however, effective methods are still lacking. In the present work, steam explosion (SE), thermal, and aerobic composting treatments were performed to investigate the resource utilization of cephalosporin C fermentation residue (CFR). The results show that 0 mg/kg, 50.2 mg/kg and 150.5 mg/kg cephalosporin C (CEPC) remained after the SE, composting, and thermal treatments. The total abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) decreased by 62.2% and 47.2% after the SE and thermal treatments and increased by 1.4 times in the samples subjected to composting. Nitrogen analysis showed that the nitrogen loss (N loss) was only 1.9% in the SE-treated samples. The antibiotic inhibition zone was reduced by 80.3%, 71.2% and 40.8% in the samples subjected to SE, composting, and thermal treatments. LC/MS showed that the β-lactam ring and dihydrothiazine ring of CEPC were largely destroyed via SE. These results suggest that the SE treatment not only decreased the residual cephalosporin and ARG levels and antimicrobial activity but also preserved most of the nitrogen. SE is therefore a feasible treatment that can be used to deal with CFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.