ArticleToxics2026
Study on the Difference in the Contribution of Soil Particle Sizes to Heavy Metal Exposure of Children Around Smelting Area.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focused on children residing near a smelter in Baiyin, and investigated the impact mechanism of different soil particle sizes on children's exposure to heavy metals. By analyzing the distribution pattern of concentrations and bioaccessibilities of typical heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb) across four particle size fractions (<63 μm, 63-150 μm, 150-250 μm, 250-352 μm), and incorporating the size-selective adherence characteristics of children's hand-loaded dust, this research quantitatively assessed the contribution of each particle size fraction to children's health risks from oral exposure. The results showed that fine particle size soil (<63 μm) exhibited both higher concentration and bioaccessibility of heavy metals, which were 1.3-1.9 times and 1.1-2.2 times higher, respectively, than those of the coarsest fraction (250-352 μm). The proportion of particles < 63 μm in children's hand-loaded dust (64.3%) was significantly higher than that in ambient soil, demonstrating selective adherence towards finer particles during children's exposure. Due to the particle size-selective effects on metal concentration, bioaccessibility, and actual child exposure, fine soil particles constituted the primary source of heavy metal exposure risk via oral ingestion in children. Soil particles with a size of <63 μm contributed 48-60% to the total exposure risk of the five heavy metals. Therefore, in the health risk assessment of soil around smelting plants, the influence of particle size on the occurrence characteristics of metals, bioaccessibility, and children's actual exposure behavior should be considered concurrently to enhance the accuracy and targetability of assessment and control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.