Target and Non-Target Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Emerging Aromatic Contaminants in Outdoor Dust from a Petrochemical-Impacted Residential Area.

Yimeng Si, Siyuan Li, Yu Wang, Hao Chen, Yanlong Zhang, Shaoping Kuang, Hongwen Sun

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yimeng SiCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China.

Siyuan LiMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.

Yu WangMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5665-3164

Hao ChenMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6152-1075

Yanlong ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.

Shaoping KuangCollege of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China.

Hongwen SunMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.

Funding

111 Program, Ministry of Education, China B17025Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province 2021CXGC011206National Natural Science Foundation of China 42377223National Natural Science Foundation of China 42577444Tianjin Natural Science Foundation 25JCZDJC01230

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex contamination characteristics and potential health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives remain poorly understood. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of 16 parent PAHs and 34 derivatives was conducted in outdoor dust samples collected from a residential area constructed on an abandoned petrochemical site. The results showed that the total concentrations of PAHs, oxidized PAHs, nitro-PAHs, brominated PAHs, and chlorinated PAHs were in the ranges of 75.3-991 ng/g, 9.27-142 ng/g, 1.68-265 ng/g, 15.2-100 ng/g, and 1.23-14.8 ng/g, respectively. Additionally, the non-target screening analysis identified 29 potential aromatic compounds in dust samples. Toxicity assessment indicated that several PAH derivatives and newly identified compounds exhibited stronger acute toxicity than PAHs (ECOSAR model prediction). Incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) values of target compounds ranged from 1.54 × 10

Indexed as

incremental lifetime cancer risknon-target analysisPAHPAH derivatives

Identifiers

PMID41893491

DOI10.3390/toxics14030223

PMCPMC13029854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.