ArticleMembranes2026
Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Counter-Current Flow in Channels Separated by a Membrane.
Article in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies have investigated counterflow and concurrent flow in channels separated by a membrane to simulate mass transfer through membranes; however, few of them have used computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The current study aimed to numerically simulate and physically describe the distribution of pressure and velocity in counter-current flow by solving Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations in the channel and membrane pores (vertical channels). This is in contrast to most previous studies, in which the channel flow was simulated using N-S equations while ultra-filtration membrane flow was simulated using Darcy's law. Consequently, the current study was executed using a CFD simulation to achieve several significant features: avoiding the execution of experimental tests, reducing the effort of model design and the expense and time consumption of fabrication, and facilitating the easy observation of variations in the pressure and the horizontal and vertical velocity for each point in the model. Two-dimensional CFD methods directly simulated the flow in channels and membrane pores to solve the N-S equations for each point in the whole domain, for which the velocity (horizontal and vertical) and pressure were calculated. In the current study, it was found that the pressure decreased from the inlet to the outlet of the channel, the horizontal velocity decreased from the inlet to the middle of the channel length and then increased to the outlet of the channel, and the vertical velocity decreased from the inlet to the middle of the channel length (L/2) with an upward direction (positive) and from L/2 to the outlet of the channel with a downward direction (negative). The analytical solution (1D model) was used to validate a numerical simulation (CFD) for the current study, but there were slight differences in the results between them. The results were perfectly explored and displayed the flow distribution patterns inside the channels and the membrane pores (vertical channels). The current study model represents the hemodialysis process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.