ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Micro- and Nano-Structuring of Hydroxyapatite-MMT-Loaded Hydrogels for Bone Regeneration Applications.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone regeneration focuses on the creation of functional tissue to repair bone defects. Creating a biodegradable scaffold hydrogel that combines a hemostatic agent with bioactive ceramics can afford the biological and mechanical benefits of both components. In the present study, we developed an injectable gelatin-alginate dual-composite hydrogel, loaded with two functional fillers: hydroxyapatite (HA) and the hemostatic agent montmorillonite (MMT). HA (microparticles and nanoparticles) was incorporated at concentrations of 10-30 mg/mL, with and without MMT at 20 mg/mL. The effects of functional fillers and their concentration on the microstructure and resulting physical and mechanical properties were studied, and a qualitative model summarising these effects was developed. All formulations exhibited clinically appropriate gelation times (5-29 s). n-HA significantly prolonged gelation time, reaching 29 ± 3 s at 30 mg/mL, while MMT reduced gelation time at all concentrations. The tensile strength of the unloaded hydrogel reached 20 kPa and increased to 57 kPa with 30 mg/mL of n-HA. The tensile strength even increased further with the addition of MMT (77 kPa). The results indicate that the combination of HA and MMT produced dual micro-composite hydrogels with moderate reinforcement, whereas the combination of n-HA and MMT generated dual nano-micro composites with combined reinforcing effects. The latter exhibited the highest strength and sealing ability while maintaining clinically relevant gelation times and controlled swelling behaviour. In conclusion, the combination of MMT with n-HA or HA enables the creation of functional hydrogels with controlled properties, tailored to specific applications in bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.