ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Coronary Atherosclerosis in Master Athletes: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise-Induced Coronary Remodeling and the Atherosclerotic Paradox in Endurance Athletes: Toward a Unified Mechanobiological Framework.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerosis in master athletes represents a paradox: despite the well-established cardiovascular benefits of regular exercise, highly trained endurance athletes show a higher prevalence of coronary plaques than their non-athletic peers. The mechanisms behind this finding are multifactorial, involving sustained high shear stress on the vascular wall, exercise-induced inflammatory activation, altered calcium homeostasis, and interactions between genetic predisposition and sport-specific lifestyle factors. Although athletes tend to exhibit predominantly calcified-potentially more stable-plaques, recent studies highlight that mixed and non-calcified lesions are also present, particularly among lifelong endurance athletes, raising questions about their true long-term risk. Clinically, traditional risk scores often underestimate risk in this population, making multimodal assessment with tools such as coronary calcium scoring and coronary CT angiography essential. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on mechanisms, clinical implications, diagnostic strategies, and prevention of coronary atherosclerosis in athletes, while underscoring key gaps that future research must address.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.