Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892933›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Advanced Sensitive Feature Machine Learning for Aesthetic Evaluation Prediction of Industrial Products.

Jinyan Ouyang, Ziyuan Xi, Jianning Su, Shutao Zhang, Ying Hu, Aimin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinyan OuyangSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4165-8573
Ziyuan XiSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.
Jianning SuSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2409-9207
Shutao ZhangSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-5443
Ying HuSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.
Aimin ZhouSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.

Funding

Innovation Fund Project of Colleges and Universities in Gansu Province 2025A-020National Natural Science Foundation of China 52165033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As product aesthetics increasingly drive consumer preference, quantitative evaluation remains hindered by subjective evaluation biases and the black-box nature of modern artificial intelligence. This study proposes an advanced machine learning framework incorporating sensitivity-aware morphological features for the aesthetic evaluation of industrial products, with automotive design as a representative case. An aesthetic index system and its quantitative formulations are first developed to capture the morphological characteristics of product form. Subjective weights are determined via grey relational analysis (GRA), while objective weights are calculated using the coefficient of variation method (CVM) integrated with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). A game-theoretic weighting approach is then employed to fuse subjective and objective weights, thereby establishing a multi-scale aesthetic evaluation system. Sensitivity analysis is applied to identify six key indicators, forming a high-quality dataset. To enhance prediction performance, a novel model-improved lung performance-based optimization with backpropagation neural network (ILPOBP)-is proposed, where the optimization process leverages a maximin latin hypercube design (MLHD) to enhance exploration efficiency. The ILPOBP model effectively predicts aesthetic ratings based on limited morphological input data. Experimental results demonstrate that the ILPOBP model outperforms baseline models in terms of accuracy and robustness when handling complex aesthetic information, achieving a significantly lower test set mean absolute relative error (MARE = 4.106%). To further enhance model interpretability, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are employed to elucidate the internal decision-making mechanisms, offering reverse design insights for product optimization. The proposed framework offers a novel and effective approach for integrating machine learning into the aesthetic assessment of industrial product design.

Indexed as

aesthetic evaluationcomputer visioninterpretabilitymachine learningoptimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41892933
PMCPMC13027916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.