ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Advanced Sensitive Feature Machine Learning for Aesthetic Evaluation Prediction of Industrial Products.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As product aesthetics increasingly drive consumer preference, quantitative evaluation remains hindered by subjective evaluation biases and the black-box nature of modern artificial intelligence. This study proposes an advanced machine learning framework incorporating sensitivity-aware morphological features for the aesthetic evaluation of industrial products, with automotive design as a representative case. An aesthetic index system and its quantitative formulations are first developed to capture the morphological characteristics of product form. Subjective weights are determined via grey relational analysis (GRA), while objective weights are calculated using the coefficient of variation method (CVM) integrated with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). A game-theoretic weighting approach is then employed to fuse subjective and objective weights, thereby establishing a multi-scale aesthetic evaluation system. Sensitivity analysis is applied to identify six key indicators, forming a high-quality dataset. To enhance prediction performance, a novel model-improved lung performance-based optimization with backpropagation neural network (ILPOBP)-is proposed, where the optimization process leverages a maximin latin hypercube design (MLHD) to enhance exploration efficiency. The ILPOBP model effectively predicts aesthetic ratings based on limited morphological input data. Experimental results demonstrate that the ILPOBP model outperforms baseline models in terms of accuracy and robustness when handling complex aesthetic information, achieving a significantly lower test set mean absolute relative error (MARE = 4.106%). To further enhance model interpretability, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are employed to elucidate the internal decision-making mechanisms, offering reverse design insights for product optimization. The proposed framework offers a novel and effective approach for integrating machine learning into the aesthetic assessment of industrial product design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.