ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Automated Malaria Ring Form Classification in Blood Smear Images Using Ensemble Parallel Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manual microscopy for malaria diagnosis is labor-intensive and prone to inter-observer variability. This study presents an automated binary classification approach for detecting malaria ring-form infections in thin blood smear single-cell images using a parallel neural network framework. Utilizing a balanced Kaggle dataset of 27,558 erythrocyte crops, images were standardized to 128 × 128 pixels and subjected to on-the-fly augmentation. The proposed architecture employs a dual-branch fusion strategy, integrating a convolutional neural network for local morphological feature extraction with a multi-head self-attention branch to capture global spatial relationships. Performance was rigorously evaluated using 10-fold stratified cross-validation and an independent 10% hold-out test set. Results demonstrated high-level discrimination, with all models achieving an ROC-AUC of approximately 0.99. The primary model (Model#1) attained a peak mean accuracy of 0.9567 during cross-validation and 0.97 accuracy (macro F1-score: 0.97) on the independent test set. In contrast, increasing architectural complexity in Model#3 led to a performance decline (0.95 accuracy) due to higher false-positive rates. These findings suggest that moderate-capacity feature fusion, combining convolutional descriptors with attention-based aggregation, provides a robust and generalizable solution for automated malaria screening without the risks associated with over-parameterization. Despite a strong performance, immediate clinical use remains limited because the model was developed on pre-segmented single-cell images, and external validation is still required before routine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.