ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Design and Development of an Automated Pipeline for Medical Hyperspectral Image Acquisition, Processing, and Fusion.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated and comprehensive processing of hyperspectral image data is increasingly important in academic research and medical technology. This study presents an automated processing pipeline that integrates hyperspectral image acquisition, analysis, multimodal fusion, and centralized data management to improve the interpretability of spectral information for biological tissue analysis. The pipeline supports modular hyperspectral data processing, fusion of complementary wavelength ranges, and scalable data storage, and was implemented in Python 3.13.3. The pipeline was evaluated using hyperspectral imaging data acquired from a coronal mouse brain section. Clustering-based analysis and spectral correlation metrics were applied to assess the impact of multimodal data fusion on spectral representation. Clustering of individual modalities yielded silhouette coefficients of 0.5879 for near-infrared data, 0.6020 for mid-infrared data, and 0.6715 for RGB data. Multimodal fusion reduced the silhouette coefficient to 0.5420 and enabled the identification of anatomical structures that were not distinguishable in any single modality. High spectral correlation coefficients exceeding 0.98 confirmed that spectral fidelity was preserved during fusion. These results demonstrate that automated multimodal hyperspectral data fusion can enhance the interpretability of biological tissue despite reduced clustering compactness. The proposed pipeline provides a structured framework for preclinical hyperspectral imaging workflows and supports exploratory biological analysis in medical imaging contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.