ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Automated Acquisition to Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular imaging is a cornerstone of modern cardiology, yet its clinical impact is limited by operator dependence, inter-observer variability, time-consuming workflows, and unequal access to advanced expertise. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, offers new opportunities to overcome these limitations. This review aims to summarize current and emerging AI applications in cardiovascular imaging and to evaluate their potential clinical value in precision diagnostics and decision support. This narrative review synthesizes clinically relevant literature on AI applications across major cardiovascular imaging modalities, including echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and nuclear cardiology. Evidence was analyzed with a focus on AI-enabled acquisition support, image segmentation, quantitative and functional assessment, workflow automation, and risk stratification, alongside key methodological and implementation considerations. Across imaging modalities, AI-driven approaches have demonstrated improved reproducibility, efficiency, and scalability of cardiovascular imaging workflows. Automated algorithms reduce operator dependence, facilitate standardized extraction of imaging biomarkers, and support advanced functional assessment and prognostic stratification. Recent developments in video-based, temporal, and multimodal models further expand AI capabilities from technical automation toward integrated disease phenotyping and personalized clinical decision support. However, translation into routine practice remains limited by heterogeneous datasets, insufficient external validation, algorithmic bias, limited interpretability, and challenges related to regulatory approval and workflow integration. Artificial intelligence has the potential to reshape cardiovascular imaging into a more efficient, reproducible, and patient-centered precision medicine tool. Real-world clinical impact will depend on outcome-driven evaluation, robust external validation, multimodal data integration, and human-in-the-loop implementation strategies that ensure safe, equitable, and clinically meaningful adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.