ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Landscape of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Molecular Detection to Clinical Practice.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) has become a central determinant of prognosis and treatment planning in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD assessment is now aided by a wide range of technologies, including next-generation sequencing, PCR-based assays, multiparameter flow cytometry, and emerging approaches such as liquid biopsy platforms and imaging-based detection. These modalities differ in sensitivity, applicability, and interpretive framework, yet each offers distinct advantages in specific disease contexts. Beyond technical issues, MRD is becoming increasingly integrated into clinical practice. In non-intensive treatment settings, where targeted and low-intensity regimens rely on dynamic disease monitoring to guide ongoing management, MRD is increasingly being used to inform therapeutic decisions. In the peri-transplant setting, MRD status influences conditioning strategies, donor selection, and the use of post-transplant interventions. Despite the growing evidence supporting the clinical relevance of MRD across these scenarios, challenges remain regarding standardization, optimal timing of assessment, and the interpretation of discordant results. This review summarizes the full landscape of MRD detection methods and examines the evolving role of MRD in contemporary AML management, emphasizing current applications and areas requiring further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.