SynthesisMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Prognosis of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Observational Studies.
Synthesis in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is uncommon but increasingly encountered as more women delay childbearing. Its prognostic impact remains controversial, particularly for cancers diagnosed in the early postpartum period. We aimed to synthesize contemporary evidence on the prognosis of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery compared with breast cancer in other young women, with a specific focus on differences between pregnancy time and postpartum disease.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of observational studies published from 2005 onwards that reported oncologic outcomes for women with invasive PABC versus non-PABC comparators or PABC-only cohorts with internal timing comparisons. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched using predefined strategies. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-E tool, treating PABC status as the exposure. Because of substantial heterogeneity in PABC definitions, outcomes and adjustment sets, no meta-analysis was performed.
resultsTwenty-one observational studies (single-center, multicenter and population-based) were included. PABC cases more often presented with larger tumors, higher nodal burden, high-grade and hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive phenotypes and worse survival compared to non-PABC controls. In most contemporary cohorts that delivered guideline-oriented therapy and adjusted for stage and tumor biology, a diagnosis during pregnancy was not an independent predictor of poorer disease-free or overall survival. In contrast, multiple large registry and institutional studies reported significantly higher risks of recurrence and death for cancers diagnosed in the early postpartum period, even after multivariable adjustment.
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that pregnancy itself does not inevitably worsen breast cancer prognosis when treatment is not compromised. However, breast cancers diagnosed soon after childbirth represent a distinct high-risk subgroup. These findings support full-intensity, guideline-based therapy during pregnancy and highlight the need for special attention and further research focused on postpartum breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.