ReviewCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2026
Accuracy and Safety of Computer-Assisted Surgery (CAS) in the Treatment of TMJ Ankylosis-Report of Several Cases and Review of the Literature.
Review in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is an uncommon condition in the modern world, yet it remains a significant treatment challenge. One of the main intraoperative difficulties is accurately and safely resecting the ankylotic mass.
objectiveThis study seeks to share our clinical experience with various types of complications and to review the literature on the clinical and technological evidence regarding the accuracy of surgical detachment of the ankylotic mass from the skull.
methodsA literature review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Search strategies were categorized into search 1 for evaluating 3D-printed technology and search 2 for computer-assisted surgical navigation.
resultsOne study was selected for search 1 and 2 for search 2. Also, three cases of intraoperative surgical complications associated with the resection of the ankylotic mass were presented. The 3D surgical cutting guides were found to be accurate in guiding the superior, inferior, and depth of the osteotomy. Angulation control was less than optimal. Navigation guiding proved accurate in maintaining the planned thickness of the skull base and the anterior wall of the external auditory canal.
conclusionNavigation guiding is a superior method for achieving predictable anatomical resection of the ankylotic mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.