ReviewDentistry journal2026
Sex-Specific Oral Health: A Narrative Review of Hormonal Influences and Disease Patterns.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Health Across the Menopausal Transition: Biological Pathways, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Role of β-adrenergic signaling in the development of Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review aims to analyze sex-specific differences in oral health, examine hormonal influences in women during puberty, pregnancy, and menopause, and compare oral health behaviors between men and women. Articles were selected based on: (1) sex-specific aspects of oral diseases, (2) hormonal influences on oral health, (3) comparative analyses between sexes, and (4) sex-disaggregated data on oral disease prevalence. Women experience hormonal vulnerabilities with estrogen deficiency causing xerostomia, mucosal atrophy, and increased caries susceptibility, showing parallels between oral and vaginal mucosa. Men demonstrate higher periodontitis prevalence (57% vs. 38%), utilize preventive services one-third less frequently, and show higher smoking rates (67% vs. 42%) and traumatic dental injuries (2:1 ratio). Women maintain better oral hygiene and treatment adherence. Sex-specific factors affecting both sexes remain unconsidered in dental practice. Women need targeted interventions during hormonal transitions, while men require improved preventive care engagement. Future research integrating sex-specific considerations is required to enable personalized oral health approaches for both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.