ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Southern Italy: A Retrospective Analysis of 11,653 Cases.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major public health issue, with survival largely determined by the initial rhythm and timeliness of resuscitation. Comprehensive population-based data are essential for guiding prevention, emergency medical services (EMS) planning, and improving outcomes. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of all adult OHCA cases managed by EMS in Lecce (Italy) between January 2013 and March 2025. Demographics, arrest circumstances, initial rhythm, time intervals, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were analyzed across age, sex, temporal, and pandemic-related strata. Rhythm classification followed European Resuscitation Council guidelines. (3) Results: A total of 11,653 cases were analyzed (mean age 76.8 ± 15.5 years, 56.6% male). Asystole (AS) was the predominant rhythm (88.7%), followed by ventricular fibrillation (VF, 7.6%), pulseless electrical activity (PEA, 1.3%), and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT, 0.08%). VF was more common in younger and male patients, while AS increased with age. Hour-level analysis revealed circadian peaks: VF in late afternoon and AS in early morning. Pandemic analysis showed reduced VF and increased AS during COVID-19, with partial recovery post-pandemic. ROSC occurred in 3.47% overall, strongly associated with shockable rhythms. EMS response times were stable across day-night and pandemic phases. (4) Conclusions: AS dominates OHCA presentations, especially among the elderly, whereas VF remains the strongest predictor of ROSC. Circadian variation at the hourly level suggests potential for EMS optimization. Pandemic-related shifts in rhythm highlight the vulnerability of the chain of survival to societal disruptions. Strengthening bystander CPR, expanding AED availability, and tailoring EMS strategies remain key priorities for improving OHCA outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.