ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Real-World Outcomes of Inhaled Treprostinil in Pulmonary Hypertension Related to Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute myocardial infarction following inhaled treprostinil initiation.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled Treprostinil is the primary treatment of pulmonary hypertension related to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Despite treatment effectiveness in clinical trials, the real-world safety and tolerability of this therapy remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of adults with PH-ILD who were prescribed inhaled treprostinil. We assessed clinical outcomes, 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and changes in natriuretic peptides (BNP, NT-proBNP), as well as medication tolerance. Eighty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The 6MWD data was collected but a limited number of patients had results within close proximity to initiation of inhalational treprostinil with only seven patients having assessments within the 3 months prior to initiation as well as 3 months post therapy. Limited 6MWD data is likely due, in part, to coinciding with the COVID pandemic, limiting face-to-face interactions and exercise testing. The majority of our subjects, 63%, had an absolute improvement in their BNP level, over a mean duration of 170 days. However, no significant difference was detected between baseline and follow-up natriuretic peptide levels. Adherence was assessed and the majority (77%) of patients remained on therapy at the time of censoring, with three-quarters (75%) meeting the target dose. Of the 15 patients intolerant to nebulized treprostinil who were transitioned to a dry powder inhaler, the majority (87%) were able to tolerate the other formulation. The medication was well-tolerated with a large percentage of patients remaining on therapy indefinitely and reaching the targeted therapeutic dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.