ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hyaluronic Acid-Based Gels and Biomaterial Systems for Oral Wound Healing: Design and Clinical Translation.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Scales: Integrating Hyaluronan-Based Nanoencapsulation into 3D Hydrogel Constructs for Advanced Therapeutics-A Comprehensive Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hyaluronic Acid-Based Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Repair and Wound Healing: Clinical Evidence and Emerging Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Natural Bioactive Compounds in Dental Materials: Balancing Biological Activity and Functional Properties.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA), a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan and major component of the extracellular matrix, has attracted increasing interest as a therapeutic adjunct in oral wound management due to its biological activity and biocompatibility. The search for the current narrative review literature was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to December 2025. Eligible studies included experimental investigations, clinical trials, and relevant reviews assessing HA applications in oral mucosal or gingival wounds. Available clinical evidence suggests potential benefits of HA in reducing postoperative discomfort, accelerating re-epithelialization, and improving soft tissue healing following periodontal and surgical procedures. However, substantial heterogeneity exists regarding molecular weight, formulation, concentration, and application protocols, which limits direct comparison between studies and precludes definitive conclusions. Further well-designed, standardized clinical trials are required to clarify optimal formulations and confirm long-term therapeutic benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.