ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantitative Assessment of Hydrogel Printability in Extrusion Bioprinting.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printing of Magnetoactive Gelatin-Alginate Scaffolds.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning-Assisted Quantitative Printability Assessment in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting-A Systems-Engineering Proof-of-Concept.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computational approaches in bioprinting processes.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- Physical and Mechanical Characterisation of 3D-Bioprinted Hydrogels for Dental Applications: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anionic Polysaccharides: Promising 3D Bioink Candidates for Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting enables the fabrication of complex tissue structures, yet achieving both high structural fidelity and cell viability remains challenging due to complex bioink rheology and parameter interplay. This review presents a quantitative framework linking hydrogel properties to printing outcomes. Key rheological features-shear-thinning, yield stress, reversible gel-sol transition, self-healing, and creep resistance-are examined for their roles in extrusion and shape retention. We also evaluate printing accuracy using metrics such as filament uniformity and multilayer stability. Advanced models, including Herschel-Bulkley and extrusion pressure models, correlate material parameters with flow dynamics and predict critical factors like wall shear stress. Finally, we propose an integrated assessment system combining material properties, process parameters, and structural fidelity to guide bioink design and printing optimization, advancing the field of hydrogel bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.