Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892447›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Multicenter Analytical Performance Evaluation of the BD Phoenix NMIC-461 Panel for Carbapenemase Classification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of

Jingjia Zhang, Liying Sun, Ge Zhang, Wei Kang, Tong Wang, Jin Li, Haotian Gao, Qiwen Yang, Kuixia Sun, Qian Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jingjia ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3791-1580
Liying SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Ge ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Wei KangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Haotian GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Qiwen YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Kuixia SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Qian WangNational Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Hongli SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-028National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-C-060National Science and Technology Major Project 2024ZD0532804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsA total of 714 non-repetitive clinical isolates from three tertiary hospitals in China were enrolled. Carbapenemase production was confirmed by the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), while carbapenemase typing was validated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for ten antimicrobial agents was performed using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of carbapenemase detection were 98.8% (95% CI, 96.6-99.6) and 92.4% (95% CI, 89.5-94.6) separately compared to sequencing. Classification accuracy was compromised by carbapenemase-positive unclassified strains, particularly reducing sensitivity for

conclusionsThe BD Phoenix NMIC-461 panel provides reliable AST results for commonly encountered Gram-negative bacterial isolates. Regarding carbapenemase detection, the panel demonstrates high sensitivity but only moderate specificity in classifying carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO), with a relatively high proportion of positive unclassified isolates among

Indexed as

Acinetobacter spp.antimicrobial susceptibility testingBD PhoenixcarbapenemaseEnterobacteralesNMIC-461Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID41892447
PMCPMC13023592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.