ReviewCells2026
Understanding Eosinophil Heterogeneity: The Known and Unknown.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Eosinophil Extracellular Traps in Health and Disease: From Host Defense to Chronic Inflammation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophils are multifunctional granulocytes with central roles in the pathobiology of chronic airway diseases. While systemic eosinophilia (>300 cells/μL) is a well-established biomarker to guide therapeutic decision-making, accumulating evidence indicates that eosinophils are not a uniform population but instead exhibit substantial phenotypic and functional heterogeneity across biological compartments, inflammatory states, and disease contexts. In this review, we synthesize the current understanding of eosinophil heterogeneity in airway diseases and critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of surface marker-based approaches, with emphasis on CD62L/L-selectin-defined subpopulations. Although CD62L-based stratification has provided valuable insight into eosinophil activation and tissue localization, its limited specificity, inconsistent clinical associations, and reliance on murine models restrict its utility as a framework for eosinophil subtyping in humans. We highlight how transcriptomic and proteomic profiling has transformed the field by revealing that peripheral blood eosinophils are largely quiescent, whereas disease-relevant functional specialization is predominantly acquired within inflamed tissues in response to cues from the local microenvironment. These molecular studies support a model in which eosinophil heterogeneity represents a continuum of activation rather than discrete, fixed subsets. A refined, integrative approach to understanding eosinophil heterogeneity is critical for improving patient stratification, predicting therapeutic responsiveness, and optimizing precision medicine strategies in chronic airway diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.