Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892209›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Research Progress in Bat Dietary Analysis: Methods, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Qiulin Guo, Yingying Liu, Sen Liu, Yang Geng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiulin GuoCollege of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Street, Changchun 130118, China.
Yingying LiuJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, 2555 Jingyue Street, Changchun 130117, China.
Sen LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2258-3676
Yang GengCollege of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Street, Changchun 130118, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2025M782637National Natural Science Foundation of China 32430066National Natural Science Foundation of China 32500411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats (Chiroptera) provide critical ecosystem services, including pest suppression, pollination, and seed dispersal. Understanding their dietary ecology is essential for conservation management yet has historically been constrained by methodological limitations. This review synthesizes advances in bat dietary analysis over the past several decades, from traditional morphological and stable isotope approaches to the revolutionary DNA metabarcoding techniques that now dominate the field. We systematically evaluate the strengths and limitations of each methodological approach and examine how molecular methods have transformed our understanding of bat trophic ecology. Research progress across major feeding guilds-insectivorous, frugivorous, nectarivorous, carnivorous, and sanguivorous bats-is examined, with emphasis on recent discoveries enabled by molecular techniques. We discuss ecological and conservation applications, including ecosystem service quantification, food web construction, and responses to environmental change. Finally, we identify priority directions for future research, including long-read sequencing technologies, multi-method integration, reference database expansion, and One Health applications. This synthesis provides guidance for researchers selecting appropriate analytical approaches and highlights the critical role of dietary studies in bat conservation amid accelerating global change.

Indexed as

ChiropteraconservationDNA metabarcodingecosystem servicesmolecular diet analysispest controlstable isotopestrophic ecology

Identifiers

PMID41892209
PMCPMC13024549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.