ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Knowledge and Awareness of the General Public on Lung Cancer Screening Modalities and Lung Cancer Preventive Methods in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally and is often diagnosed at advanced stages in Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study aimed to quantify public awareness and knowledge of lung cancer screening (LCS) using LDCT and identify barriers to its implementation in Riyadh. A validated 24-item questionnaire was administered to 452 participants to assess demographic factors, smoking history, and LCS knowledge. Results revealed that only 30.1% of participants had heard of LCS, and 50.2% demonstrated "poor" knowledge scores (mean score 11.0 ± 4.97). Higher knowledge scores were significantly associated with being female, having a bachelor's degree or higher, and being a non-smoker. While 78.1% expressed willingness to undergo screening, the most significant barrier was a lack of knowledge about the test (44.1%), followed by concerns regarding radiation exposure (36.1%). Conversely, a healthcare provider's recommendation was identified as the primary motivator for 53.3% of respondents. These findings highlight a critical "awareness-willingness" gap. While public willingness is high, this should not be misconstrued as systemic preparedness; substantial educational and structural gaps remain that must be bridged before national implementation can be considered feasible. We conclude that while public willingness is high, successful implementation requires a transition toward organized invitation systems and the use of multifactorial risk profiles. Integrating epidemiological evidence with proactive policy design is essential to ensure that the national program avoids systematic under- or over-inclusion and remains effective for all demographics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.