Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892146›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Topology and Size Optimization of Trusses by Bone Remodeling: Primary Force-Based Approach.

Burak Kaymak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Burak KaymakDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, 43100 Kütahya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-0456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an optimization tool inspired by bone remodeling principles to address the high computational costs of truss topology optimization. Additionally, a new structural analysis method based on primary forces is proposed to overcome the kinematic stability problem. The strategy developed to obtain the optimal topology optimizes the initial dense ground structure in two stages. In Phase I, unnecessary members in the system are filtered to determine the "primary candidate members"; in Phase II, the final topology is reached through this refined subset. The algorithm performs an effective search in the design space by simulating biological processes that link the rate of mass change in the bone matrix to mechanical stimuli. Numerical results demonstrate high accuracy, as shown by the analytical solution of the 2D Michell truss, with a difference of 1.02%. The results show high consistency with reference studies, providing, in some cases, alternative topologies with the same weight and stiffness as given in the benchmarks. The proposed method achieves significant improvements in computational efficiency, reducing processing times for larger systems by 10 to over 250 times compared to literature benchmarks.

Indexed as

bone remodelingforce methodground structure methodkinematic stabilityMichell trussprimary force-based approachtopology optimizationtruss

Identifiers

PMID41892146
PMCPMC13023632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.