ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer-Tuned LQR Attitude Control of a Three-DOF Hover System.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attitude control of unmanned aerial vehicles is a problem that needs to be solved in a reliable manner. The research presented in this paper examines a systematic approach to the design of an LQR state feedback controller for the three-DOF hover system. The state space model is used to derive the feedback gain K, with the diagonal elements of the weighting matrices Q and R used as design variables. A multi-objective grey wolf optimizer is used to obtain Q-R matrices based on closed-loop simulations under representative roll, pitch and yaw reference commands. There are four separate multi-objective optimization runs, each using one of four standard error indices which are the integral of absolute error (IAE), the integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE), the integral of squared error (ISE) and the integral of time-weighted squared error (ITSE). Each index is used to track roll, pitch and yaw errors at the same time and the resulting non-dominated solution sets are post-processed using TOPSIS to select a compromise knee-point design. The simulation results show that the adjusted LQR parameters lead to feasible tracking performance. The proposed framework provides a systematic and replicable method for LQR weight selection in hover-type attitude control problems under the considered simulation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.