ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
X-Ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials for Mimicking Tissues in Radiographic Phantoms Measured by CT from 70 to 140 kV: 2025 Update.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of dopants on X‑ray attenuation of 3D‑printed polymers for mammography and tomosynthesis spectra.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Mimicking Tissues in 3D-Printed Radiology Phantoms: Brand, Product, and Color of Printing Filaments Matter!Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhantoms are essential in medical imaging, providing reproducible and quantitative means for system and protocol evaluation, image quality assessment, and dosimetry without patient exposure. Additive manufacturing enables rapid, accurate fabrication of phantoms ranging from simple geometries to complex anthropomorphic models. Ongoing developments in 3D printing technologies and polymer formulations have enhanced mechanical properties and printability, but also affect X-ray attenuation behaviour, necessitating an update with current materials to facilitate the choice of appropriate materials mimicking body tissues in radiographic phantoms.
methodsAttenuation properties of 27 photopolymer resins and 22 thermoplastic filaments (based on PLA, ABS, HIPS, PETG/PCTG, and PVB) were quantified using a clinical CT scanner at 70-140 kV to establish reference data for material selection.
resultsAt 120 kV, resins exhibited attenuation values between 124 and 384 Hounsfield Units (HU), and filaments ranged from -69 to 308 HU (PLA-based filaments: 160 to 241 HU, ABS: -32 to 43 HU, PETG/PCTG: 151 to 308 HU, and HIPS: -69 to -22 HU). Energy dependence of HU values is presented from 70 to 140 kV tube potential. Compared to the 2021 study, a wider selection of X-ray opacities is available. Regarding SLA/DLP printing, resins with higher attenuation were identified, and flexible resins that had provided a choice of low attenuation printing materials in the range of 60 to 90 HU at 120 kV tended to replicate attenuation properties closer to rigid photopolymers; i.e., HU values were slightly higher. In FDM filaments, a wide variation in different PLA-, ABS-, and HIPS-based filaments is found. In copolymers from the PET/PCTG/PETG family, very inhomogeneous X-ray attenuations are still found, as anticipated.
conclusionsThe range of X-ray attenuation observed demonstrates that commercially available 3D printing materials can replicate clinically relevant tissues and tissue-equivalent contrasts. Furthermore, the available range of attenuations has increased, as has the finer gradation of these materials. These findings support the design of patient- and task-specific imaging phantoms for optimization of acquisition protocols, image quality evaluation, and radiation dose studies, as well as facilitate the selection of appropriate phantom materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.