ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bio-Inspired Feedback Visual Network for Robust Small-Target Motion Detection in Complex Environments.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In dynamic and complex real-world environments, artificial intelligence (AI) vision systems continue to face significant challenges in accurately detecting and tracking small objects. The core difficulty lies in the fact that small targets usually exhibit limited spatial and textural features, while dynamic backgrounds often generate numerous misleading motion cues, thereby interfering with reliable discrimination between targets and backgrounds. Inspired by the remarkable capability of the insect brain in detecting small moving objects, this study proposes a visual neural network model enhanced by a feedback mechanism. By adaptively responding to temporal variations, the proposed model is able to more precisely distinguish small targets from background-induced false targets. The network architecture consists of two main pathways: a motion detection pathway that extracts motion-related features from minute targets, and a feedback attention pathway that enhances the focus on true targets by leveraging the feature differences between real and false motion signals. In addition, a global inhibition module is incorporated to reduce the false alarm rate by filtering out background-induced false positives, thereby improving the overall detection performance of the model. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a detection rate of 0.81 in complex visual scenarios, whereas the compared models all achieve detection rates below 0.59, indicating a significant improvement in detection performance. Meanwhile, in terms of Precision and F1-score, the proposed model achieves values of 0.0648 and 0.12, respectively, while the compared models obtain values lower than 0.0077 and 0.015, further validating the superiority of the proposed method in detection accuracy and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.