Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892109›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Regenerative Approach for Improving Flap Survival: Perspective of Angiogenesis.

Se Hyun Yeou, Yoo Seob Shin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Se Hyun YeouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-479X
Yoo Seob ShinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2007-1100

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, Republic of Korea RS-2021-NR061354 and RS-2024-00438448Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HR21C1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flap reconstruction remains a cornerstone after oncologic resection, trauma, and complex wounds, yet partial necrosis, venous congestion, and delayed healing continue to drive morbidity and unplanned re-exploration. Even when macroscopic inflow and outflow are re-established, distal and border-zone tissue may remain constrained by microcirculatory dysfunction. This review frames flap compromise as a biomimetics-relevant failure of a hierarchical transport network and summarizes the vascular repair mechanisms that regenerative interventions aim to replicate. We outline key concepts governing flap perfusion, including angiosomes, choke vessels, endothelial barrier failure, mural cell support, and immune regulation within the angiogenic niche, and relate these to no-reflow, thrombo-inflammation, and impaired vascular regeneration. We then synthesize regenerative strategies aimed at durable reperfusion, spanning recombinant factors, gene and nucleic acid delivery, cell-based therapies, cell-free biologics, including extracellular vesicles and platelet-derived products, pharmacologic modulators, and biomaterial platforms that localize and sustain bioactivity. Translation will require functional perfusion endpoints, standardized reporting of delivery parameters, and safety-conscious designs that minimize aberrant angiogenesis and vector-related risks in post-resection settings.

Indexed as

angiogenesismicrocirculationregenerative medicinesurgical flaps

Identifiers

PMID41892109
PMCPMC13023543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.