Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892104›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biomimetic Anisotropy for Directional Transport of Liquid and Solid Samples.

Adem Ozcelik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adem OzcelikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin 09100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3124-795X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimetic anisotropy is defined as intentionally engineered, nature-inspired directional differences in structure, chemistry, roughness, stiffness, or pore architecture. These directional differences lower transport resistance in one direction relative to the opposite direction, which results in rectified transport. In this review, anisotropy design is synthesized across surfaces, porous materials, and soft systems, with transport considered for droplets, low-surface-tension liquids, particles, and soft objects. Biological inspirations are summarized first, and the design lessons that can be transferred to engineered platforms are then extracted. Key anisotropic architectures are classified next, including ratchets and sawtooth textures, bristle- or setae-like fibrillar arrays, grooves and wedges, asymmetric pores and membranes, chemically patterned surfaces, and hierarchical micro-nano combinations. Practical fabrication methods and material choices are reviewed thereafter, spanning micro- and nanofabrication, additive manufacturing, coatings and surface modification, and responsive soft matter. The field is then organized mechanistically around how anisotropy generates directionality through contact-line pinning asymmetry, curvature-driven capillary pressure bias, compliance and elastocapillary coupling, and active rectification under oscillatory forcing. Finally, these mechanisms are connected to application needs in pump-free microfluidics and sampling, long-distance open transport, environmental water management, and fouling-prone self-cleaning systems. Throughout the review, design-to-function links are emphasized, and open challenges are highlighted, including durability under real fluids and contaminants as well as scalable manufacturing and integration.

Indexed as

biomimetic anisotropycapillary-pressure biasdirectional wettingelastocapillary couplingrectified transport

Identifiers

PMID41892104
PMCPMC13024278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.