Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41892102›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Narrative Review of Endodontic Biomaterials.

Rosana Farjaminejad, Samira Farjaminejad, Alexander Garcia-Godoy, Franklin Garcia-Godoy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosana FarjaminejadDepartment of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-7795-0444
Samira FarjaminejadDepartment of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-8339-0272
Alexander Garcia-GodoyDepartment of Bioscience Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 7737 N University Dr, Ste 204, Tamarac, FL 33321, USA.
Franklin Garcia-GodoyDepartment of Bioscience Research, Bioscience Research Center, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-3306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in biomaterials have transformed the field of endodontics, shifting treatment approaches from mechanical interventions to biologically driven regenerative therapies. This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of endodontic biomaterials, emphasizing their roles in disinfection, obturation, root repair, surgical procedures, and regenerative endodontics. Key materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement demonstrate superior sealing, biocompatibility, and osteogenic potential compared to traditional materials. The integration of nanotechnology, bioactive components, and smart drug delivery systems has further enhanced antimicrobial properties and tissue interaction. Clinical applications, including regenerative procedures using platelet-rich fibrin and case-based biomaterial usage, are discussed to illustrate their relevance and effectiveness in real-world practice. Despite significant progress, challenges such as regulatory hurdles, economic limitations, and translational gaps persist. Emerging trends such as 3D printing, personalized medicine, and multifunctional scaffolds offer promising directions for future endodontic care. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to overcome current barriers and facilitate widespread adoption of next-generation biomaterials. Unlike prior reviews that categorize endodontic biomaterials descriptively by material class or technological advancement, this review introduces an indication-based comparative framework aligning biomaterial properties with specific clinical decision points and corresponding levels of evidence. By integrating biological mechanisms, translational considerations, and clinical application within a structured decision-oriented model, the manuscript offers analytical synthesis rather than a purely descriptive overview.

Indexed as

bioceramicsbiomaterialsdrug deliveryendodonticsregeneration

Identifiers

PMID41892102
PMCPMC13024164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.