ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Improved Artificial Lemming Algorithm Integrating Non-Uniform Mutation and Q-Learning Adaptation for Underwater Manipulator Controller Tuning.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse Mutation for Optimization Learning Artificial Lemming Algorithm and Its Application in Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the rapid population diversity loss and premature convergence of the Artificial Lemming Algorithm (ALA) in complex optimization problems, this paper proposes an Improved Artificial Lemming Algorithm (IALA) with multi-strategy enhancements inspired by lemming behavior. First, a non-uniform mutation operator and a nonlinear step-size strategy are introduced to strengthen local optima escape capability and optimization precision. Second, inspired by the foraging and positioning behavior of lemmings, a relative advantage learning strategy is designed to reduce dependence on the global best individual, further enhancing the algorithm's exploration ability. Finally, a Q-learning-based adaptive mechanism is integrated to intelligently orchestrate five lemming-inspired behavioral modes through a nonlinear reward function, enabling adaptive switching among search patterns. Comparative experiments on the CEC2022 benchmark suite demonstrate that IALA achieves a Friedman mean rank of 1.25, ranking first with a significant margin. Compared with the original ALA and other six classical and state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms, and four recently proposed improved ALA variants (EALA, IALA_Tan, DMSALAs, and MsIALA), the Wilcoxon rank-sum test confirms that IALA is significantly outperformed in only 2 out of 120 pairwise comparisons, exhibiting remarkable advantages in optimization accuracy, convergence speed, and robustness. Ablation experiments validate the synergistic necessity of all three strategies, with the Q-learning adaptive mechanism identified as the most critical contributor. Exploration-exploitation balance analysis and search history visualization further confirm that IALA achieves a smooth adaptive transition from global exploration to local exploitation. Space complexity analysis reveals that the Q-table introduces only approximately 19.5 KB of fixed additional overhead, which becomes negligible for high-dimensional problems. Furthermore, IALA is successfully applied to the parameter tuning of underwater manipulator controllers, verifying its efficiency and reliability in real-world engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.