ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multi-UAV Cooperative Path Planning Using a Behavior-Adaptive Aquila Optimizer Under Multiple Constraints.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing the challenges of high dimensionality, strong nonlinearity, and multiple constraints in multi-UAV cooperative path planning, this paper proposes a Behavior-Adaptive Aquila Optimizer (EAO) achieved by enhancing Aquila Optimizer (AO). EAO constructs a multi-strategy cooperative framework that integrates a periodic diversity maintenance mechanism, a diversity-based dynamic neighborhood guidance mechanism, a narrowed exploitation behavior based on neighborhood differential evolution, and a search-state-aware adaptive behavior selection mechanism. Through dynamic behavior adjustment during the search process, the proposed algorithm improves search performance and stability. To validate its effectiveness, EAO was systematically evaluated on the CEC2017 and CEC2020 benchmark suites and compared with the original AO and 13 representative high-performance optimization algorithms. Parameter sensitivity analysis, an ablation study, and an exploration-exploitation experiment were also conducted. The results show that EAO achieves the best overall performance ranking. Furthermore, EAO was applied to multi-UAV cooperative path-planning simulations in complex environments that considered UAV dynamic constraints. Comparative experiments with five competitive algorithms demonstrate that EAO achieves superior performance in terms of path-planning fitness, number of effective trajectories, and runtime. Compared with AO, EAO improves the average fitness by 80.42%, 81.25%, 81.34%, and 84.84% across different map environments, confirming its feasibility and effectiveness for multi-UAV cooperative path planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.