ArticleBiosensors2026
Blood Pressure Estimation Through Pulse Wave Analysis Using Features Extracted from Carotid Diameter Distension Waveforms.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Silicon-photonics optoacoustic sensor for fully wearable blood pressure monitoring.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure estimation through pulse wave analysis (PWA) aims to establish the relationship between features of pulse waveforms and blood pressure. This study is the first to investigate the connection between features of carotid artery diameter waveforms and variations in blood pressure, as well as to develop a blood pressure estimation model based on these features. A dataset was constructed from 14 subjects, with data collected across various physiological states and time points. For each subject, carotid artery diameter waveforms were measured using ultrasound, while synchronous blood pressure data were recorded with a reference device. A total of 52 morphological features were extracted from the diameter waveforms and their first and second derivatives. The influence of different models and feature combinations on blood pressure estimation was analyzed using various machine learning approaches. Ultimately, optimal models were developed for each subject to dynamic blood pressure fluctuations. On independent test data where blood pressure fluctuations exceeded 25 mmHg, the mean absolute error (MAE) of the estimates was 3.3 ± 4.1 mmHg. Even after a period of two days or more, the models remained effective, yielding a MAE of 4.2 ± 5.3 mmHg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.