ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Incorporating Next-Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening for Organic Acidemias.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organic acidemias (OADs) are a group of inherited metabolic disorders with a high false-positive rate in newborn screening. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a combined genetic test for OADs. From September 2022 to August 2025, 154,634 newborns underwent primary screening using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Among them, 151 neonates with suspected OADs underwent combined genetic screening using a pre-designed NGS panel. Of these, 55 cases tested positive on genetic screening, and 17 were ultimately diagnosed with OADs, yielding a prevalence of 1 in 9096. The positive predictive value of NGS was 30.91% (17/55). The genotypes of nine patients (9/17, 52.9%) were identified through NGS screening. Notably, one case of methylmalonic acidemia that would have been missed by MS/MS screening was successfully identified using the combined genetic screening. Additionally, 37 neonates with positive biochemical screening results were confirmed to be either carriers or unaffected individuals. Two cases of Wilson's disease were also identified through combined genetic screening. Therefore, integrating NGS into conventional MS/MS-based screening can significantly reduce the false-positive rate and shorten the time from screening to definitive diagnosis. This approach provides a valuable model for improving the efficiency and accuracy of newborn genetic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.