ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Birth Prevalence of Sickle Cell Disease in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening helps identify sickle cell disorder (SCD) early and to promptly initiate effective measures. It is estimated that India accounts for approximately 16% of global annual births with SCD. Multiple reports of screening for SCD in India have emerged in the last decade. Our aim was to pool the birth prevalence of SCD and sickle cell trait (SCT). A systematic review of published evidence on nontargeted, universal screening for SCD or SCT in newborns was performed (16 studies). The pooled prevalence of SCD was 1100 per 100,000 (10 studies, 88,276 neonates, 95% CI: 432, 1768), while that of SCT was 9639 per 100,000 (7 studies, 72,702 neonates, 95% CI: 6283, 12,995) in endemic regions. Limited data exist from nonendemic regions. Only three studies had data on follow-up and confirmatory genetic diagnosis. Sparse data exist on cost-effectiveness, long-term follow-up, and the impact of early screening on mortality. Concerted ongoing efforts in the identification of the burden are needed. The needs of the hour are universalization of NBS, integration into existing health systems, and maintenance of birth cohorts with early introduction of penicillin prophylaxis, hydroxyurea, parental education, appropriate immunization, and continued follow-up by an experienced medical team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.