ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Indel pattern-guided repair mapping reveals genome-wide DNA repair networks in CRISPR/Cas9 editing.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger diverse repair outcomes, yet the dynamic regulatory networks governing these outcomes remain incompletely understood. Here, we develop indel pattern-guided repair mapping, an integrative framework that deciphers DSB repair mechanisms by integrating repair outcome spectra, kinetic dynamics, and functional gene regulation. Our analysis categorizes Cas9-mediated repair outcomes into seven distinct patterns based on their frequency and sequence characteristics, revealing differential repair kinetics among these subtypes. Functional clustering identifies three regulatory pillars: (i) microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-driven MH deletions form a cohesive module defined by a shared regulatory network of protein-coding genes and miRNAs, rather than by the core repair enzymes themselves; (ii) non-homologous end joining coordinates 1 bp insertions and non-MH deletions, with RFC4/5 stabilizing repair templates to suppress large deletions; (iii) Atypical repair outcomes show distinct genetic signatures: large insertions are associated with polymerase-related regulators, whereas mutations are associated with a signature enriched for chromatin-associated regulators. Strikingly, S100A8 emerges as a potent MMEJ suppressor via direct interaction with PARP1, revealing unappreciated cross-talk between inflammatory signaling and DSB repair pathway choice. By linking repair outcome patterns to molecular determinants, our work provides a transformative platform to interrogate DNA repair mechanisms for precise genome editing optimization and therapeutic genome stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.