Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41891877›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Indel pattern-guided repair mapping reveals genome-wide DNA repair networks in CRISPR/Cas9 editing.

Yanbin Wan, Xuanye Zhao, Xiding Lin, Lv Wang, Xiaoqiang Ai, Jianmin Jiang, Liya Han, Dongchao Huang, Hongli Du, Lizhen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanbin WanSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xuanye ZhaoSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xiding LinSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Lv WangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xiaoqiang AiSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jianmin JiangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Liya HanSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Dongchao HuangMedical Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
Hongli DuSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6419-0160
Lizhen HuangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9839-4620

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515011733Guangdong Province Drug Administration Science and Technology Innovation 2024ZDZ07Guangdong Province Drug Administration Science and Technology Innovation Project 2024ZDZ07Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Provinc 2025A1515010459Open Project of the China NMPA Key Laboratory for Animal Alternative Testing Technology of Cosmetics GZYZH2023001Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 202206010073Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2023A03J0542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger diverse repair outcomes, yet the dynamic regulatory networks governing these outcomes remain incompletely understood. Here, we develop indel pattern-guided repair mapping, an integrative framework that deciphers DSB repair mechanisms by integrating repair outcome spectra, kinetic dynamics, and functional gene regulation. Our analysis categorizes Cas9-mediated repair outcomes into seven distinct patterns based on their frequency and sequence characteristics, revealing differential repair kinetics among these subtypes. Functional clustering identifies three regulatory pillars: (i) microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-driven MH deletions form a cohesive module defined by a shared regulatory network of protein-coding genes and miRNAs, rather than by the core repair enzymes themselves; (ii) non-homologous end joining coordinates 1 bp insertions and non-MH deletions, with RFC4/5 stabilizing repair templates to suppress large deletions; (iii) Atypical repair outcomes show distinct genetic signatures: large insertions are associated with polymerase-related regulators, whereas mutations are associated with a signature enriched for chromatin-associated regulators. Strikingly, S100A8 emerges as a potent MMEJ suppressor via direct interaction with PARP1, revealing unappreciated cross-talk between inflammatory signaling and DSB repair pathway choice. By linking repair outcome patterns to molecular determinants, our work provides a transformative platform to interrogate DNA repair mechanisms for precise genome editing optimization and therapeutic genome stabilization.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA RepairGene EditingINDEL MutationDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1

Identifiers

PMID41891877
PMCPMC13023040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.